Why IQ Testing Should Be Mandatory When Hiring for the C-Suite

Chris Apps • 21 July 2025

Because Intelligence Isn’t Optional at the Top

The stakes are high when organisations set out to hire for the C-Suite, and so is the failure rate. Global studies suggest that 30–40% of C-Suite hires fail within their first three years, and up to 50% of senior leaders underperform or prove ineffective.


Why does this happen? It’s not a lack of experience, technical skill, or commercial acumen that causes leaders to fall short. It’s the absence of intelligence, as well as four other core traits. Traits that can’t be coached or taught on the job.


The five non-negotiable factors for successful C-Suite executives:

  1. Intelligence (IQ) 🧠
  2. Integrity 🧭
  3. Humility / Conscientiousness 🤲
  4. Curiosity / Agreeableness 🧩
  5. Health and Energy ⚡


These factors are the necessary foundations for effective leadership, and they can be measured. But, just focusing on IQ testing, we
know that intelligence, as measured through IQ or aptitude testing, is the single strongest predictor of success in a senior leadership role. Yet, in many organisations, especially at the board level, cognitive testing is skipped entirely. “We just assume they’re smart. They’re already senior” is a common view.


Boards often feel uncomfortable asking senior leaders to complete assessments. There’s a perception that it’s “beneath” someone at that level or that it signals a lack of trust. But the real risk lies in not testing.


Assuming something is not due diligence and that mindset often results in costly mis-hires, especially when candidates look sophisticated on paper, interview well, and offer glowing (self-nominated) referees, but may lack the intellectual horsepower required to lead complex organisations.


A candidate who interviews well doesn’t necessarily think well. Boards are often swayed by presentation, confidence, and experience, all of which are visible and easy to assess. But traits like strategic thinking, mental agility, and problem-solving under pressure? These require deliberate testing. Without it, boards are blind to critical risk factors in a candidate’s leadership profile.


Relying on intuition, gut feel, charisma, and experience alone is not enough. If you want more successful C-Suite executives and fewer costly leadership failures, you must test for what really matters.


Stop assuming, start measuring, and make it a standard part of the executive hiring process.


Want to improve your hiring process?
Contact Fermion for expert psychometric testing solutions.

About the Author:

Fermion specialises in psychometric testing for recruitment. Please contact Fermion to discuss how a test of IQ, EQ, and a personality profile, or any other psychometric test, can help with your recruitment decisions.


Christopher Apps is a Workplace Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.


The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

AI recruitment selection concept with claw machine choosing candidate from crowd of candidates
by Chris Apps • 6 October 2026
A mediocre hire may quietly cost your business for years. Discover why better recruitment decisions need to prevent average hires as well as obvious mishires.
Four white cubes displaying icons for listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills.
by Chris Apps • 29 September 2026
Good candidates can interview well, but can they do the work? Skills testing adds objective evidence to recruitment before you make the final hiring decision.
A hand interacting with a glowing HR dashboard in futuristic graphic style on a dark background.
by Chris Apps • 24 September 2026
Great recruitment is not just about today’s vacancy. Learn why future capability, adaptability and psychometric testing can improve hiring decisions.
A graphic with the symbols from Microsoft's big 3 - Excel, Word and PowerPoint.
by Chris Apps • 16 September 2026
Skills testing can verify current competence, but better recruitment decisions also consider cognitive ability, personality and evidence from multiple sources.
A graphic with the words
by Chris Apps • 10 September 2026
Reference checks can add useful evidence, but they are biased and imperfect. Learn how to use them without giving weak evidence too much influence in hiring.
A job candidate being interviewed by a panel of four.
by Chris Apps • 1 September 2026
Interviews should not do all the work. Screening, testing and gathering evidence first can reduce bias and help organisations make better hiring decisions.
3 job candidates waiting for an interview
by Chris Apps • 27 August 2026
Better hiring decisions come from a disciplined recruitment process that standardises assessment, informs candidates and combines multiple sources of evidence.
A male office worker pointing his finger a t a male colleague in anger.
by Chris Apps • 18 August 2026
A great interview can create false confidence. Learn how psychometric testing and multiple sources of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
A male at  a job interview
by Chris Apps • 12 August 2026
Interview confidence can feel convincing, but intuition is often unreliable. Better hiring decisions come from structured evidence and multiple data sources.
A graphic showing the four elements of EQ
by Chris Apps • 27 July 2026
Technical skill is not enough when a role involves people, pressure and judgement. Emotional intelligence can help employers reduce poor hiring decisions.
Show More