Great Interviews Don’t Equal Great Hires

Chris Apps • 25 February 2026

Why the traditional recruitment process keeps letting the wrong candidates through

“They interviewed well, and their reference checks were excellent, but…”


This is a phrase we often hear from new clients after one or two of their own mishires.


A mishire is costly for everyone: the candidate is unhappy because the job didn’t work out and they must start again, and the business is unhappy for the same reason. It’s costly in terms of money, but also emotionally. A mishire is a terrible, yet preventable, outcome.


A poor selection process will pick good and bad candidates, but a good selection process will weed out the bad candidates while identifying good candidates. This is the difference and why sometimes the “interview & reference check” approach works, but it’s the costly mishires you need to avoid, and you do that by having a stepwise selection process that allows you to see different sides of the candidate.


A traditional recruitment process can still produce good hires, but it also lets the wrong ones through, and that’s the real cost.  


The Interview Is the Least Reliable Predictor of Performance 

Think about it. You’re sitting across from a stranger, a stranger who chose what went on their CV, selected their referees, rehearsed their answers and studied your company online. They control the information, and you react to it.


If your hiring process relies heavily on interviews and reference checks, you’re making high-stakes decisions with low-predictive tools.


And that’s where a stepwise process, one that incorporates psychometric testing, into the process is the game changer.


The Smarter Way to Recruit: Flip the order → improve the outcome

The small change that delivers dramatically better hiring decisions is simple:

  1. Screen candidates first
  2. Test second
  3. Interview last


By the time you get to the interview, the candidate is no longer a stranger, and you’re armed with data, behavioural insights, and context. That lets you ask sharper, more targeted questions and make significantly better decisions.


Modern Innovative Recruitment is About

  • A standardised and structured hiring process
  • Screening and testing candidates before the interview
  • It’s a two-way process; you are learning about the candidate, and they are learning about you and your business.
  • Only interview good candidates
  • Incorporate evidence-based psychometric tests that have high validity and reliability.

About the Author:

Christopher Apps is an Organisational Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.

 

The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

AI recruitment selection concept with claw machine choosing candidate from crowd of candidates
by Chris Apps • 6 October 2026
A mediocre hire may quietly cost your business for years. Discover why better recruitment decisions need to prevent average hires as well as obvious mishires.
Four white cubes displaying icons for listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills.
by Chris Apps • 29 September 2026
Good candidates can interview well, but can they do the work? Skills testing adds objective evidence to recruitment before you make the final hiring decision.
A hand interacting with a glowing HR dashboard in futuristic graphic style on a dark background.
by Chris Apps • 24 September 2026
Great recruitment is not just about today’s vacancy. Learn why future capability, adaptability and psychometric testing can improve hiring decisions.
A graphic with the symbols from Microsoft's big 3 - Excel, Word and PowerPoint.
by Chris Apps • 16 September 2026
Skills testing can verify current competence, but better recruitment decisions also consider cognitive ability, personality and evidence from multiple sources.
A graphic with the words
by Chris Apps • 10 September 2026
Reference checks can add useful evidence, but they are biased and imperfect. Learn how to use them without giving weak evidence too much influence in hiring.
A job candidate being interviewed by a panel of four.
by Chris Apps • 1 September 2026
Interviews should not do all the work. Screening, testing and gathering evidence first can reduce bias and help organisations make better hiring decisions.
3 job candidates waiting for an interview
by Chris Apps • 27 August 2026
Better hiring decisions come from a disciplined recruitment process that standardises assessment, informs candidates and combines multiple sources of evidence.
A male office worker pointing his finger a t a male colleague in anger.
by Chris Apps • 18 August 2026
A great interview can create false confidence. Learn how psychometric testing and multiple sources of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
A male at  a job interview
by Chris Apps • 12 August 2026
Interview confidence can feel convincing, but intuition is often unreliable. Better hiring decisions come from structured evidence and multiple data sources.
A graphic showing the four elements of EQ
by Chris Apps • 27 July 2026
Technical skill is not enough when a role involves people, pressure and judgement. Emotional intelligence can help employers reduce poor hiring decisions.
Show More