Great Interviews Don’t Equal Great Hires

Chris Apps • 25 February 2026

Why the traditional recruitment process keeps letting the wrong candidates through

“They interviewed well, and their reference checks were excellent, but…”


This is a phrase we often hear from new clients after one or two of their own mishires.


A mishire is costly for everyone: the candidate is unhappy because the job didn’t work out and they must start again, and the business is unhappy for the same reason. It’s costly in terms of money, but also emotionally. A mishire is a terrible, yet preventable, outcome.


A poor selection process will pick good and bad candidates, but a good selection process will weed out the bad candidates while identifying good candidates. This is the difference and why sometimes the “interview & reference check” approach works, but it’s the costly mishires you need to avoid, and you do that by having a stepwise selection process that allows you to see different sides of the candidate.


A traditional recruitment process can still produce good hires, but it also lets the wrong ones through, and that’s the real cost.  


The Interview Is the Least Reliable Predictor of Performance 

Think about it. You’re sitting across from a stranger, a stranger who chose what went on their CV, selected their referees, rehearsed their answers and studied your company online. They control the information, and you react to it.


If your hiring process relies heavily on interviews and reference checks, you’re making high-stakes decisions with low-predictive tools.


And that’s where a stepwise process, one that incorporates psychometric testing, into the process is the game changer.


The Smarter Way to Recruit: Flip the order → improve the outcome

The small change that delivers dramatically better hiring decisions is simple:

  1. Screen candidates first
  2. Test second
  3. Interview last


By the time you get to the interview, the candidate is no longer a stranger, and you’re armed with data, behavioural insights, and context. That lets you ask sharper, more targeted questions and make significantly better decisions.


Modern Innovative Recruitment is About

  • A standardised and structured hiring process
  • Screening and testing candidates before the interview
  • It’s a two-way process; you are learning about the candidate, and they are learning about you and your business.
  • Only interview good candidates
  • Incorporate evidence-based psychometric tests that have high validity and reliability.

About the Author:

Christopher Apps is an Organisational Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.

 

The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

A male office worker pointing his finger a t a male colleague in anger.
by Chris Apps 18 August 2026
A great interview can create false confidence. Learn how psychometric testing and multiple sources of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
A male at  a job interview
by Chris Apps 12 August 2026
Interview confidence can feel convincing, but intuition is often unreliable. Better hiring decisions come from structured evidence and multiple data sources.
A graphic showing the four elements of EQ
by Chris Apps 27 July 2026
Technical skill is not enough when a role involves people, pressure and judgement. Emotional intelligence can help employers reduce poor hiring decisions.
A test item from an IQ test
by Chris Apps 21 July 2026
A strong CV and interview do not always show whether a candidate can learn quickly, handle complexity and meet the real demands of the role.
Business people looking over accounts
by Chris Apps 14 July 2026
A mishire can cost far more than salary. Better recruitment protects profit, reduces wasted time and builds stronger teams that last and perform well.
A graphic depicting a job candidate between a CV and test
by Chris Apps 10 July 2026
Traditional recruitment rewards confidence and polish. A modern selection process uses stronger evidence to identify who is genuinely most likely to succeed.
A business meeting with one man point his finger in an aggressive manner towards a colleague
by Chris Apps 2 July 2026
Most role failures are not about technical skills alone. Learn how personality, judgement and cognitive fit shape better hiring decisions over time and prevent pain.
A graphic of a bulls eye with a resume attached to an arrow
by Chris Apps 23 June 2026
Candidates can use AI to appear ideal, but presentation is not proof. Discover how a convergence of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
Business meeting in a modern conference room, with silhouetted people around a long table at sunset.
by Chris Apps 26 May 2026
Poor hiring decisions do more than create mishires. Without a clear process, they can damage trust, invite claims of bias and expose the business.
Notebook page reading “Role Expectations” with a pen on a wooden desk
by Chris Apps 18 May 2026
Candidates need the truth about the role, the culture and the manager. Honest recruitment reduces mismatched expectations and costly mishires before they start.
Show More