Great Interviews Don’t Equal Great Hires

Chris Apps • 25 February 2026

Why the traditional recruitment process keeps letting the wrong candidates through

“They interviewed well, and their reference checks were excellent, but…”


This is a phrase we often hear from new clients after one or two of their own mishires.


A mishire is costly for everyone: the candidate is unhappy because the job didn’t work out and they must start again, and the business is unhappy for the same reason. It’s costly in terms of money, but also emotionally. A mishire is a terrible, yet preventable, outcome.


A poor selection process will pick good and bad candidates, but a good selection process will weed out the bad candidates while identifying good candidates. This is the difference and why sometimes the “interview & reference check” approach works, but it’s the costly mishires you need to avoid, and you do that by having a stepwise selection process that allows you to see different sides of the candidate.


A traditional recruitment process can still produce good hires, but it also lets the wrong ones through, and that’s the real cost.  


The Interview Is the Least Reliable Predictor of Performance 

Think about it. You’re sitting across from a stranger, a stranger who chose what went on their CV, selected their referees, rehearsed their answers and studied your company online. They control the information, and you react to it.


If your hiring process relies heavily on interviews and reference checks, you’re making high-stakes decisions with low-predictive tools.


And that’s where a stepwise process, one that incorporates psychometric testing, into the process is the game changer.


The Smarter Way to Recruit: Flip the order → improve the outcome

The small change that delivers dramatically better hiring decisions is simple:

  1. Screen candidates first
  2. Test second
  3. Interview last


By the time you get to the interview, the candidate is no longer a stranger, and you’re armed with data, behavioural insights, and context. That lets you ask sharper, more targeted questions and make significantly better decisions.


Modern Innovative Recruitment is About

  • A standardised and structured hiring process
  • Screening and testing candidates before the interview
  • It’s a two-way process; you are learning about the candidate, and they are learning about you and your business.
  • Only interview good candidates
  • Incorporate evidence-based psychometric tests that have high validity and reliability.

About the Author:

Christopher Apps is an Organisational Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.

 

The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

A graphic depicting a job candidate between a CV and test
by Chris Apps 10 July 2026
Traditional recruitment rewards confidence and polish. A modern selection process uses stronger evidence to identify who is genuinely most likely to succeed.
A business meeting with one man point his finger in an aggressive manner towards a colleague
by Chris Apps 2 July 2026
Most role failures are not about technical skills alone. Learn how personality, judgement and cognitive fit shape better hiring decisions over time and prevent pain.
A graphic of a bulls eye with a resume attached to an arrow
by Chris Apps 23 June 2026
Candidates can use AI to appear ideal, but presentation is not proof. Discover how a convergence of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
Business meeting in a modern conference room, with silhouetted people around a long table at sunset.
by Chris Apps 26 May 2026
Poor hiring decisions do more than create mishires. Without a clear process, they can damage trust, invite claims of bias and expose the business.
Notebook page reading “Role Expectations” with a pen on a wooden desk
by Chris Apps 18 May 2026
Candidates need the truth about the role, the culture and the manager. Honest recruitment reduces mismatched expectations and costly mishires before they start.
Two people in business attire shaking hands across a white desk with paperwork and a keyboard.
by Chris Apps 12 May 2026
Resumes, interviews and reference checks all contain "noise" and error. Discover how stronger recruitment systems improve hiring accuracy and reduce mishires.
Man at desk with coffee and snacks, balancing a pen between two wire fixtures while looking focused
by Chris Apps 5 May 2026
Difficult employees rarely appear overnight. Discover how recruitment decisions influence behaviour and what you can do early to avoid costly mistakes.
Handshake over a digital network with glowing data icons and charts in blue tones
by Chris Apps 28 April 2026
Hiring decisions feel rational, but they often aren't. Discover how emotion and AI shape candidate experience and why removing the human touch creates costly mistakes.
Two people in a meeting, smiling across a table with a laptop and papers.
by Chris Apps 22 April 2026
Hiring decisions often start with instinct, not evidence. Discover why confident choices can go wrong and how internal talent is frequently undervalued.
Hands checking items on a clipboard checklist with a red pen
by Chris Apps 20 April 2026
Hiring mistakes often start before the interview. Use a pre-interview checklist to improve structure, reduce bias, and make more effective hiring decisions.
Show More