Why General Intelligence is the Engine of Workplace Performance

Chris Apps • 11 August 2025

Understanding General Intelligence in the Workplace

Want to improve workplace productivity? Start testing for general intelligence; it’s one of the strongest predictors of workplace performance, and it’s easy to measure.


General intelligence, sometimes called g, reflects an individual’s ability to reason, learn quickly, solve problems, and adapt to new situations. In a business environment, these abilities are essential for productivity, innovation, and long-term success.
 


A Racetrack Analogy

Imagine a racetrack and three well-built cars, albeit with different-sized engines:

  • Car 110 (IQ 110)
  • Car 100 (IQ 100)
  • Car 90  (IQ 90)


The track is mostly smooth with gentle curves, but there’s one challenging section: a steep hill with a complex chicane — the workplace equivalent of a difficult, multi-step problem.  


Lap Times: How Engine Size, or Intelligence, Affects Performance

  • Car 110: Navigates the chicane with ease, completing a lap in  2 minutes.
  • Car 100: Handles it steadily but takes  3 minutes.
  • Car 90: Gets through with help, completing the lap in  4 minutes.


Productivity Compounds Over Time


Over one hour:

  •  Car 110 completes  30 laps.
  • Car 100 completes  20 laps.
  • Car 90 completes  15 laps with assistance.


All the cars can do their job; however, there are marked differences in their performance and productivity.
When your workplace faces “complex chicanes”, big challenges, new systems, unexpected problems, the capability difference becomes obvious.


Even small differences in performance per lap become significant over time. This mirrors how workplace productivity gaps widen as tasks become more complex. Over time, small differences in capability turn into large differences in output.
 


Why This Matters for Hiring and Development


General intelligence is like the engine in a race car:


Higher intelligence 

means faster learning, better problem-solving, and processing speed.


Lower intelligence 

often requires more support, more time, and more resources to complete the same work.


The Business Impact

When your workplace hits its own “steep hill and chicane”, unexpected challenges, complex systems, urgent problem-solving, higher intelligence allows employees to:

  • Adapt faster
  • Maintain output under pressure
  • Handle complexity with less support


General intelligence testing isn’t about labelling people and lower intelligence doesn’t mean someone can’t contribute, but it often means they’ll need more time and resources to get the same job done; it’s about understanding capability so you can:

  • Hire the right people for the right roles
  • Identify high-potential staff early
  • Reduce costly performance gaps over time


📞
Contact Fermion to learn how general intelligence testing can give your organisation the edge.

About the Author:

Fermion specialises in psychometric testing for recruitment. Please contact Fermion to discuss how a test of IQ, EQ, and a personality profile, or any other psychometric test, can help with your recruitment decisions.


Christopher Apps is a Workplace Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.


The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

A male office worker pointing his finger a t a male colleague in anger.
by Chris Apps 18 August 2026
A great interview can create false confidence. Learn how psychometric testing and multiple sources of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
A male at  a job interview
by Chris Apps 12 August 2026
Interview confidence can feel convincing, but intuition is often unreliable. Better hiring decisions come from structured evidence and multiple data sources.
A graphic showing the four elements of EQ
by Chris Apps 27 July 2026
Technical skill is not enough when a role involves people, pressure and judgement. Emotional intelligence can help employers reduce poor hiring decisions.
A test item from an IQ test
by Chris Apps 21 July 2026
A strong CV and interview do not always show whether a candidate can learn quickly, handle complexity and meet the real demands of the role.
Business people looking over accounts
by Chris Apps 14 July 2026
A mishire can cost far more than salary. Better recruitment protects profit, reduces wasted time and builds stronger teams that last and perform well.
A graphic depicting a job candidate between a CV and test
by Chris Apps 10 July 2026
Traditional recruitment rewards confidence and polish. A modern selection process uses stronger evidence to identify who is genuinely most likely to succeed.
A business meeting with one man point his finger in an aggressive manner towards a colleague
by Chris Apps 2 July 2026
Most role failures are not about technical skills alone. Learn how personality, judgement and cognitive fit shape better hiring decisions over time and prevent pain.
A graphic of a bulls eye with a resume attached to an arrow
by Chris Apps 23 June 2026
Candidates can use AI to appear ideal, but presentation is not proof. Discover how a convergence of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
Business meeting in a modern conference room, with silhouetted people around a long table at sunset.
by Chris Apps 26 May 2026
Poor hiring decisions do more than create mishires. Without a clear process, they can damage trust, invite claims of bias and expose the business.
Notebook page reading “Role Expectations” with a pen on a wooden desk
by Chris Apps 18 May 2026
Candidates need the truth about the role, the culture and the manager. Honest recruitment reduces mismatched expectations and costly mishires before they start.
Show More