Workplace Safety Profile

Chris Apps • 22 August 2024

Employee Safety Awareness Profile

The Workplace Safety Profile (WSP) is a risk assessment that measures a candidate’s attitudes towards safety.


The results provide a reliable indication of the likelihood that an individual will be involved in accidents or cause injury to themselves or others at work.


The WSP can help organisations reduce the occurrence of workplace incidents and is primarily used for roles where safety behaviour is an important factor. 


When candidates complete the WSP, they indicate the extent to which they agree or disagree with each statement. Candidates respond to each question by selecting one of the five options from an agreement scale.


The assessment assesses a variety of beliefs about the self, other people, and the environment. It also assesses the extent to which candidates may be distorting or faking their responses. 


Assessment questions are streamed in a random order each time a candidate completes the WSP. This feature provides a high level of test security by limiting the likelihood that candidates will be shown questions in the same order and reducing the possibility that candidates will collaborate when completing assessments. 


The WSP measures three risk factors:

  • Safety Control - The extent to which an individual is likely to take personal responsibility for safety outcomes. Individuals with a high level of safety control believe they can influence whether an accident or injury occurs by the actions they take. These employees are more likely to adopt a proactive approach to safety and follow safety rules and procedures. 
  • Risk Aversion - The extent to which an individual is likely to avoid risky behaviour at work. Individuals with a high level of risk aversion are more cautious and careful in their approach to work. They are less likely to find risky activities exciting or thrilling, and are therefore less likely to take risks that lead to accidents and injuries. 
  • Stress Management - The extent to which an individual is likely to cope with stress on the job. People with a high level of stress management will cope better with stress and are less likely to be fatigued or distracted at work due to stress. 


Each candidate is given a percentile ranking and an Overall Rating of High, Medium, or Low, based on the risk that the candidate may engage in unsafe behaviour in the workplace. The score reports also provide scores for three subscores, including safety control, risk aversion, and stress management. 


We have been using the Workplace Safety Profile from Criteria for many years, and we are pleased with the results, as are our clients.    Fermion specialises in psychometric testing for recruitment. Please contact Fermion to discuss how the Typing and/or Data Entry tests, or any other psychometric test, can help with your recruitment decisions.

About the Author:

Christopher Apps is an Organisational Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.


The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

Graphic with a large monitor and two cartoon male figures looking at it curiously.
by Chris Apps • 27 October 2026
Discover how psychometric testing complements structured interviews, reveals useful candidate insights and helps employers make more informed recruitment decisions.
A note pad with a ticker that says
by Chris Apps • 20 October 2026
Attention to detail matters, but how can employers assess it? Discover practical ways to identify candidates who demonstrate accuracy rather than simply claim it.
Clip board  with psychometric testing results on it.
by Chris Apps • 12 October 2026
Poorly administered psychometric testing could cause you to reject excellent candidates. Learn how a structured testing process supports better hiring decisions.
AI recruitment selection concept with claw machine choosing candidate from crowd of candidates
by Chris Apps • 6 October 2026
A mediocre hire may quietly cost your business for years. Discover why better recruitment decisions need to prevent average hires as well as obvious mishires.
Four white cubes displaying icons for listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills.
by Chris Apps • 29 September 2026
Good candidates can interview well, but can they do the work? Skills testing adds objective evidence to recruitment before you make the final hiring decision.
A hand interacting with a glowing HR dashboard in futuristic graphic style on a dark background.
by Chris Apps • 24 September 2026
Great recruitment is not just about today’s vacancy. Learn why future capability, adaptability and psychometric testing can improve hiring decisions.
A graphic with the symbols from Microsoft's big 3 - Excel, Word and PowerPoint.
by Chris Apps • 16 September 2026
Skills testing can verify current competence, but better recruitment decisions also consider cognitive ability, personality and evidence from multiple sources.
A graphic with the words
by Chris Apps • 10 September 2026
Reference checks can add useful evidence, but they are biased and imperfect. Learn how to use them without giving weak evidence too much influence in hiring.
A job candidate being interviewed by a panel of four.
by Chris Apps • 1 September 2026
Interviews should not do all the work. Screening, testing and gathering evidence first can reduce bias and help organisations make better hiring decisions.
3 job candidates waiting for an interview
by Chris Apps • 27 August 2026
Better hiring decisions come from a disciplined recruitment process that standardises assessment, informs candidates and combines multiple sources of evidence.
Show More