Workplace Safety Profile

Chris Apps • 22 August 2024

Employee Safety Awareness Profile

The Workplace Safety Profile (WSP) is a risk assessment that measures a candidate’s attitudes towards safety.


The results provide a reliable indication of the likelihood that an individual will be involved in accidents or cause injury to themselves or others at work.


The WSP can help organisations reduce the occurrence of workplace incidents and is primarily used for roles where safety behaviour is an important factor. 


When candidates complete the WSP, they indicate the extent to which they agree or disagree with each statement. Candidates respond to each question by selecting one of the five options from an agreement scale.


The assessment assesses a variety of beliefs about the self, other people, and the environment. It also assesses the extent to which candidates may be distorting or faking their responses. 


Assessment questions are streamed in a random order each time a candidate completes the WSP. This feature provides a high level of test security by limiting the likelihood that candidates will be shown questions in the same order and reducing the possibility that candidates will collaborate when completing assessments. 


The WSP measures three risk factors:

  • Safety Control - The extent to which an individual is likely to take personal responsibility for safety outcomes. Individuals with a high level of safety control believe they can influence whether an accident or injury occurs by the actions they take. These employees are more likely to adopt a proactive approach to safety and follow safety rules and procedures. 
  • Risk Aversion - The extent to which an individual is likely to avoid risky behaviour at work. Individuals with a high level of risk aversion are more cautious and careful in their approach to work. They are less likely to find risky activities exciting or thrilling, and are therefore less likely to take risks that lead to accidents and injuries. 
  • Stress Management - The extent to which an individual is likely to cope with stress on the job. People with a high level of stress management will cope better with stress and are less likely to be fatigued or distracted at work due to stress. 


Each candidate is given a percentile ranking and an Overall Rating of High, Medium, or Low, based on the risk that the candidate may engage in unsafe behaviour in the workplace. The score reports also provide scores for three subscores, including safety control, risk aversion, and stress management. 


We have been using the Workplace Safety Profile from Criteria for many years, and we are pleased with the results, as are our clients.    Fermion specialises in psychometric testing for recruitment. Please contact Fermion to discuss how the Typing and/or Data Entry tests, or any other psychometric test, can help with your recruitment decisions.

About the Author:

Christopher Apps is an Organisational Psychologist and the owner of Fermion. He stays updated on the latest psychology research and shares evidence-based insights.


The focus of Fermion is "Psychometric Testing for Recruitment" and "Recruitment to Retention: How to select good staff and keep them". If you would like to learn how to select good staff and keep them, please feel free to contact us at Fermion.


“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Recent Posts

A graphic with the words
by Chris Apps 10 September 2026
Reference checks can add useful evidence, but they are biased and imperfect. Learn how to use them without giving weak evidence too much influence in hiring.
A job candidate being interviewed by a panel of four.
by Chris Apps 1 September 2026
Interviews should not do all the work. Screening, testing and gathering evidence first can reduce bias and help organisations make better hiring decisions.
3 job candidates waiting for an interview
by Chris Apps 27 August 2026
Better hiring decisions come from a disciplined recruitment process that standardises assessment, informs candidates and combines multiple sources of evidence.
A male office worker pointing his finger a t a male colleague in anger.
by Chris Apps 18 August 2026
A great interview can create false confidence. Learn how psychometric testing and multiple sources of evidence can reduce the risk of a costly mishire.
A male at  a job interview
by Chris Apps 12 August 2026
Interview confidence can feel convincing, but intuition is often unreliable. Better hiring decisions come from structured evidence and multiple data sources.
A graphic showing the four elements of EQ
by Chris Apps 27 July 2026
Technical skill is not enough when a role involves people, pressure and judgement. Emotional intelligence can help employers reduce poor hiring decisions.
A test item from an IQ test
by Chris Apps 21 July 2026
A strong CV and interview do not always show whether a candidate can learn quickly, handle complexity and meet the real demands of the role.
Business people looking over accounts
by Chris Apps 14 July 2026
A mishire can cost far more than salary. Better recruitment protects profit, reduces wasted time and builds stronger teams that last and perform well.
A graphic depicting a job candidate between a CV and test
by Chris Apps 10 July 2026
Traditional recruitment rewards confidence and polish. A modern selection process uses stronger evidence to identify who is genuinely most likely to succeed.
A business meeting with one man point his finger in an aggressive manner towards a colleague
by Chris Apps 2 July 2026
Most role failures are not about technical skills alone. Learn how personality, judgement and cognitive fit shape better hiring decisions over time and prevent pain.
Show More